Oklahoma Farm Report masthead graphic with wheat on the left and cattle on the right.
Howdy Neighbors!
Ron Hays, Director of Farm and Ranch Programming, Radio Oklahoma Ag Network  |  2401 Exchange Ave, Suite F, Oklahoma City, Ok 73108  |  (405) 601-9211

advertisements
      
   
   
   
   

Agricultural News


Congress Calls Foul on Obama Administration Plan to Expand Jurisdiction Under Clean Water Act

Tue, 19 Apr 2011 7:01:11 CDT

Congress Calls Foul on Obama Administration Plan to Expand Jurisdiction Under Clean Water Act A bipartisan group of 170 members of Congress, led by Bob Gibbs (R-Ohio) and Tim Holden (D-Pa.), issued a letter to Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Lisa Jackson and Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works (Corps) Jo-Ellen Darcy to express concern regarding an attempt by the agencies to expand their jurisdiction over U.S. waters. Specifically, EPA and the Corps sent a draft “guidance” document to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for regulatory review to identify waters subject to jurisdiction under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, more commonly known as the Clean Water Act (CWA). The members of Congress agree that the “guidance” goes beyond clarifying the scope of U.S. waters subject to Clean Water Act programs.

Both the American Farm Bureau and the National Cattlemen's Beef Association are pleased with the push back by Congress on this issue.

We have the letter written to the agencies as a PDF file linked below. Click on the PDF LINK at the bottom of this story called Gibbs Holden EPA guidance letter Final to open and read the full letter.

Bob Stallman, President of the American Farm Bureau, issued the following statement:

“The American Farm Bureau Federation appreciates the bipartisan support of 170 members of Congress in challenging ‘regulatory guidance’ that the Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers are considering for the Clean Water Act. The guidance would take an overly broad view of ‘waters of the U.S.’ It would serve as a road map for EPA and the Corps to designate nearly all water bodies, and even some dry land, as subject to federal regulations that dictate land-use decisions. If unchecked, the guidance would lead to more Clean Water Act permitting requirements, more litigation and less economic growth at a time when our nation needs it most.

“The proper procedure for putting federal policy in place is either by proposing formal rules after taking public comments into consideration or proposing legislation for Congress to consider. This current regulatory guidance effort for the Clean Water Act circumvents that process, implements controversial new policy and expands the federal government’s regulatory reach without public input or Congress’ authorization. We object to this attempt to rewrite the jurisdictional scope of the Clean Water Act and saddle farmers and ranchers with more unnecessary and expensive regulations. We commend all the members of Congress who are standing up for farmers and ranchers and other landowners by signing a letter to EPA and the Corps urging them to reconsider their proposed guidance, and we thank Reps. Bob Gibbs and Tim Holden for leading this effort.”

******************

The National Cattlemen's Beef Association (NCBA) Deputy Environmental Counsel Ashley Lyon said EPA is continuing business as usual, but Congress is pushing back.

“We are grateful for the efforts of 170 members of the U.S. House of Representatives to hold these agencies accountable,” said Lyon. “If EPA has its way, government overreach will continue to devastate financially farmers and ranchers across the country. Giving EPA the go-ahead to regulate every little drop of water in the United States is absurd.”

After the Supreme Court limited jurisdiction of waters in the CWA in two court cases, the Clean Water Restoration Act (CWRA) was introduced in the House by former Congressman James Oberstar (D-Minn.) and in the Senate by former Senator Russ Feingold (D-Wis.). Those bills would have removed the word “navigable” from the definition of “waters of the United States,” which would have given EPA and the Corps virtually limitless jurisdiction over every kind of water whether it was a puddle, ditch, mudflat or otherwise, according to Lyon. She said EPA’s best bet for greater control is a “guidance” document, but Congress is holding the agencies accountable to their statutory authority.



00130_Gibbs_Holden_EPA_guidance_letter_FINAL.pdf
   
   


 

WebReadyTM Powered by WireReady® NSI

 


Top Agricultural News

  • Expansion Partners to Heal the Harvester  Tue, 26 Oct 2021 11:55:46 CDT
  • Hilliary Communications to Launch $45 Million in Fiber-Optic Infrastructure Expansion in Rural America  Tue, 26 Oct 2021 11:48:59 CDT
  • Ralph Lauren Corporate Foundation and Soil Health Institute Unveil New U.S. Regenerative Cotton Program  Tue, 26 Oct 2021 11:34:52 CDT
  • Fire Weather Watch in Effect in Oklahoma Panhandle Ahead of Developing Storms  Tue, 26 Oct 2021 10:34:06 CDT
  • CattleFax CEO Randy Blach Says Inflated Prices are Here to Stay  Tue, 26 Oct 2021 10:23:01 CDT
  • Fanning joins OKFB as Economic Development Coordinator  Tue, 26 Oct 2021 10:02:07 CDT
  • Food Safety: The Dirty Truth About Shopping Carts  Tue, 26 Oct 2021 08:42:32 CDT
  • Evaluating Money Saved When Purchasing Feed on Cost per Unit of Protein and Energy Basis  Tue, 26 Oct 2021 08:30:04 CDT

  • More Headlines...

       

    Ron salutes our daily email sponsors!

    Oklahoma Beef council Oklahoma Ag Credit Oklahoma Farm Bureau National Livestock Credit Ag Mediation Program P&K Equipment Tulsa Farm Show Union Mutual Stillwater Milling Oklahoma Cattlemen's Association KIS FUTURES, INC.

       
       

    Search OklahomaFarmReport.com

    © 2008-2021 Oklahoma Farm Report
    Email Ron   |   Newsletter Signup   |    Current Spots   |    Program Links

    WebReady powered by WireReady® Inc.