Oklahoma Farm Report masthead graphic with wheat on the left and cattle on the right.
Howdy Neighbors!
Ron Hays, Director of Farm and Ranch Programming, Radio Oklahoma Ag Network  |  2401 Exchange Ave, Suite F, Oklahoma City, Ok 73108  |  (405) 601-9211

advertisements
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   

Agricultural News


Certified Angus Beef Champions Their Stand Against GIPSA Rule

Fri, 15 Apr 2011 10:46:00 CDT

Certified Angus Beef Champions Their Stand Against GIPSA Rule Certified Angus Beef LLC (CAB) President John Stika sent a letter to USDA Secretary Tom Vilsack to explain the branded beef company’s stand against current wording in rule changes proposed by the Grain Inspection Packers & Stockyards Administration (GIPSA)

The USDA agency last summer unveiled its proposed rule changes that govern livestock marketing. A divide soon appeared within the beef industry over lengthening the comment period, and whether the proposed changes themselves needed changes. “Fairness” debates began from coffee shops to editorials and letters to USDA expressing either support or concern over vague language.

At a USDA/Justice Dept. workshop on competition in Fort Collins, Colo., last August 27, in an open letter to Angus producers and in subsequent comments to GIPSA, Stika expressed concern over unintended consequences and called for further study because there had been very little. By the end of the extended November deadline and after two private economic analyses quantifying costs and concerns, more than 60,000 comments had come in to GIPSA. Vilsack then announced USDA would conduct its own economic impact study.   

“The issue seemed to fade a little, but in fact it has not gone away,” Stika said. “We owe it to Angus producers and all of our licensed partners across the beef industry to maintain an active role in helping USDA craft the best possible clarifications to the proposed GIPSA rules.”

The letter stated, “Pleasing the consumer is the single most effective and sustainable solution to maintaining an economically viable beef industry… Unless heavily edited, we believe the proposed rule will cause cattlemen and brand partners great economic hardships as their investment in premium genetics meet a constricted market.” While not opposing the effort to better define terms, the letter noted, “it appears the kind of clarity being proposed negates the intent and opens the doors to a long series of lawsuits … litigation will lead to a reduction in the availability of value-based marketing arrangements.”

Value separation would be minimized but “easier to defend,” the letter said. Certified Angus Beef Board Chairman Steve Olson said, “This brand has worked for years to get ranchers premiums on their high-quality cattle through value-based marketing. Because the proposed rules may threaten these premiums, we must voice our opinion.”

The American Angus Association supports these efforts, noted Association Board Chairman Joe Hampton. “By working with Secretary Vilsak, we hope Certified Angus Beef can help insure that any changes to the existing GIPSA regulations allow for the continued expansion of quality-focused, value-based marketing options,” he said. That’s what allows financial rewards for those who meet the growing consumer demand for products such as those bearing the Certified Angus Beef brand, said Association board member Leo McDonnell.

GIPSA has made it clear that its rules are not intended to “limit or eliminate the ability of companies to provide premiums to reward producers for providing certain quantity or quality of livestock,” McDonnell said “We will continue to stay engaged to ensure GIPSA stays true to these proposed intentions and to be clear that nothing in these rules will jeopardize a premium-based market.” “Angus producers have much at stake because we have worked hard to add value to our cattle,” Hampton said. “We’re happy to provide input to help ensure the GIPSA rules will result in a vibrant, healthy market that rewards quality and enhances opportunity and choices.” Stika concluded, “We have a long history with USDA and much common ground in seeking a better future for producers who aim to satisfy consumer demand. We look forward to reviewing the pending USDA economic impact study, and every opportunity to discuss solutions to our concerns.”


   

 

WebReadyTM Powered by WireReady® NSI

 


Top Agricultural News

  • Stay Ahead of Nematodes and Participate in BASF’s SCN Action Month  Fri, 15 Oct 2021 21:59:28 EDT
  • Oklahoma Grain Elevator Cash Bids as of 2 p.m. Friday, October 15, 2021  Fri, 15 Oct 2021 21:49:39 EDT
  • Friday, October 15, 2021, Market Wrap-Up with Justin Lewis  Fri, 15 Oct 2021 21:46:09 EDT
  • 2022 Edition Now Available of the NCBA Redbook   Fri, 15 Oct 2021 15:32:28 EDT
  • Congressman Frank Lucas and the Rest of the Oklahoma Delegation Call on Biden to Put American Energy First  Fri, 15 Oct 2021 13:02:04 EDT
  • USDA Designates Eight Oklahoma Counties as Primary Natural Disaster Areas  Fri, 15 Oct 2021 11:31:22 EDT
  • NCBA’s Kent Bacus Hopeful Biden Administration Will Pursue Deals Beneficial to US Beef Producers  Fri, 15 Oct 2021 10:10:35 EDT
  • Feeder Steers and Heifers Steady to Higher, Steer Calves Higher at Woodward Livestock on Thursday  Fri, 15 Oct 2021 05:26:37 EDT

  • More Headlines...

       

    Ron salutes our daily email sponsors!

    Oklahoma Beef council Oklahoma Ag Credit Oklahoma Farm Bureau National Livestock Credit Ag Mediation Program P&K Equipment Tulsa Farm Show Union Mutual Stillwater Milling Oklahoma Cattlemen's Association KIS FUTURES, INC.

       
       

    Search OklahomaFarmReport.com

    © 2008-2021 Oklahoma Farm Report
    Email Ron   |   Newsletter Signup   |    Current Spots   |    Program Links

    WebReady powered by WireReady® Inc.