Oklahoma Farm Report masthead graphic with wheat on the left and cattle on the right.
Howdy Neighbors!
Ron Hays, Director of Farm and Ranch Programming, Radio Oklahoma Ag Network  |  2401 Exchange Ave, Suite F, Oklahoma City, Ok 73108  |  (405) 601-9211

advertisements
   
   
   
   
   

Agricultural News


National Crop Insurance President Tries to Set the Record Straight on Crop Insurance

Mon, 06 May 2013 12:22:50 CDT

National Crop Insurance President Tries to Set the Record Straight on Crop Insurance
Thomas P. Zacharias, Ph.D., is president of National Crop Insurance Services and formerly was an associate professor at Iowa State University. This guest editorial appeared in CQ/Roll Call on May 6, 2013:


Admittedly, opponents of farm policy attract more headlines than the men and women who put food on our tables and clothes on our backs.


Then again, it is far easier to get attention with sensationalist claims and unsubstantiated data.


Take the drought of 2012 for example. Opponents of crop insurance made news by claiming that taxpayers would be responsible for as much as $40 billion. Critics called crop insurance a farmer bailout and said things like farmers were "laughing all the way to the bank" and were "praying for drought, not praying for rain."


Never were these anti-agriculture activists and for-hire university economists criticized for their bombastic tone or baseless predictions that turned out to be incredibly inaccurate.


Sure, farmers tried to set the record straight, but supporting a farm policy that helped protect taxpayer dollars is not as glamorous as inflated estimates and inflammatory rhetoric.


Now, crop insurance opponents are at it again as Congress prepares to negotiate a farm bill. Farmers have been accused of "taking bribes." Farmers even have been compared to cheap drunks at an open bar and told to pay their fair share.


Use of such language and misleading information is simply unprofessional and must be challenged.


Here are the undisputed facts of what transpired after the worst drought our country has seen in decades.


Indemnities to farmers cost about $17 billion. Thanks to crop insurance's design, these indemnities were not completely borne by taxpayers because farmers and insurers picked up a major portion of the costs and sustained significant economic losses.


Farmers had insurance deductibles so they shouldered at least $12.7 billion in losses before they collected a single check from their insurance companies. Not exactly "laughing all the way to the bank."


When combined with the $4.1 billion farmers paid out of their own pockets to purchase crop insurance last year, total farmer investment neared $17 billion. To any reasonable person, that constitutes "paying their fair share."


Although the final tally is not in, crop insurance companies will shoulder about $1.5 billion in losses - a cost that otherwise would have fallen to taxpayers.


This is the sixth time since 1983 that crop insurers lost money. Compare that to the property and casualty insurance industry, which has lost money only once as far back as data is available.


It is also important to note that when crop insurance premiums exceed losses, the government sees underwriting gains that help offset payments in bad years. In fact, the government experienced nearly $4 billion in gains from 2001 to 2010.


Perhaps most important of all, Congress was not asked to fund an ad hoc disaster bill despite the historic devastation endured by our agricultural producers.


That is in stark contrast to the days before the current crop insurance system. In fact, 42 ad hoc disaster bills totaling $70 billion have been passed since 1989, according to the Congressional Research Service.


Reasonable minds can differ on farm policies, and the farming community has always welcomed a reasonable debate on the issues.


However, the farming community should not be subjected to a litany of ill-conceived metaphors and tasteless punch lines wrapped in the veil of academia and protected by an outdated system of university tenure.


Instead of reprehensible quips about "open bars," we have a responsibility to raise the bar and have a reasoned dialogue. Lawmakers and the American public deserve an intelligent conversation about the future of agriculture that is kept to just the facts.



   

 

WebReadyTM Powered by WireReady® NSI

 


Top Agricultural News

  • Oklahoma Youth Expo Sale of Champions Sale Order Available Here- Sale Set for 4 PM Friday  Fri, 17 Mar 2023 04:50:54 CDT
  • Rural Voters Dominated Vote to Defeat Recreational Marijuana March 7th  Fri, 10 Mar 2023 07:13:05 CST
  • Ron Hays Talks to Israeli Ag Tour Guide Colin Lotzof About the Miraclel of Ag in Israel  Wed, 22 Feb 2023 22:11:04 CST
  • OALP Members Experience First Hand View of Cutting Edge Drip Irrigation Technology as Israel Travel Ends  Wed, 22 Feb 2023 10:51:49 CST
  • OALP Members Get First Hand View of Cutting Edge Drip Irrigation Technology as Israel Travel Ends  Wed, 22 Feb 2023 10:50:10 CST
  • Oklahoma Ag Leadership Program Sees Fruit, Beef and Dairy Production North of the Sea of Galilee in Israel  Mon, 20 Feb 2023 21:56:02 CST
  • Oklahoma Ag Leadership Program Sees Diverse Farm Operations in Jordan River Valley of Israel  Sun, 19 Feb 2023 21:17:30 CST
  • Israeli Tour Guide Mark Kedem Talks About The Cultural Aspects of What Class XX of OALP is Experiencing   Sat, 18 Feb 2023 22:17:23 CST

  • More Headlines...

       

    Ron salutes our daily email sponsors!

    Oklahoma Beef council Oklahoma Ag Credit Oklahoma Farm Bureau National Livestock Credit Ag Mediation Program P&K Equipment Oklahoma City Farm Show Union Mutual Stillwater Milling Oklahoma Cattlemen's Association KIS FUTURES, INC.
       
       
       
       
       

    Search OklahomaFarmReport.com

    © 2008-2024 Oklahoma Farm Report
    Email Ron   |   Newsletter Signup   |    Current Spots   |    Program Links

    WebReady powered by WireReady® Inc.