Oklahoma Farm Report masthead graphic with wheat on the left and cattle on the right.
Howdy Neighbors!
Ron Hays, Director of Farm and Ranch Programming, Radio Oklahoma Ag Network  |  2401 Exchange Ave, Suite F, Oklahoma City, Ok 73108  |  (405) 601-9211


Agricultural News

The Farm Bill’s Barnyard Brawl

Wed, 21 Aug 2013 18:36:59 CDT

The Farm Bill’s Barnyard Brawl
The following is an editorial by Will Coggin, a senior research analyst at the Center for Consumer Freedom, a nonprofit coalition supported by restaurants, food companies and consumers to promote personal responsibility and protect consumer choices.

The jostling over food stamps and commodity subsidies may be the crux of the Farm Bill news, but there’s a battle brewing beneath the surface. The National Conference of State Legislatures has recently shown concern, at the urging of animal liberation groups, over an amendment by Iowa Congressman Steve King that is aimed at stopping California’s interference in interstate commerce in agriculture. Opponents claim that scores of state laws will be at risk of nullification.

Far from the sky falling, if King’s amendment isn’t passed, it could encourage trade wars between states, and the average consumer’s grocery list would take a hit.

King’s amendment prevents a state from imposing additional regulations on any agricultural product that is produced elsewhere, unless the other state has the same regulation. The proposal comes after an animal-rights ballot campaign in California that banned the common hen housing used on state egg farms. The initiative was heavily funded by the vegan Humane Society of the United States. University of California-Davis researchers determined that it if passed would bankrupt the state egg industry.

Not to fear, the California legislature had a solution to saving state egg farms from animal-rights activists: Force any out-of-state farmer who wants to sell eggs in California to also abide by these same standards. This economic protectionism is what King seeks to derail.

More broadly, what this episode also illustrates is that any activist group can push a state ballot initiative in California in hopes of using it as a springboard to force a law that they could never get passed in Congress or any of the other 49 states. And when it comes to ballot campaigns, emotional arguments and money, not nuance and reason, often rule the day.

Given California’s history, that’s something the rest of us should worry about. Voters there passed a chemical “right to know” law in 1986, for instance, that has since caused a warning notice to be slapped on everything from parking lots to fishing rods to Christmas lights. (The “warning label” law can be enforced by bounty-hunter lawyers, who reap fees.)

Activists opposed to King’s interstate commerce protection have tried to create a distraction, saying his amendment could bring down laws regulating agriculture. But agriculture, including food safety, is already heavily regulated at the federal level by the USDA, FDA, and others.

Ironically, the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS), which started this commerce kerfuffle, argues that King’s amendment infringes upon states’ rights, while the group simultaneously pushes its own amendment to the Farm Bill that would preempt hen-housing standards in every state in the U.S. It sounds reasonable—it would get rid of the patchwork of state laws that HSUS itself created—but is actually a Trojan horse.

The “egg bill” would force farmers into billions of dollars of renovations or new construction, which would force smaller farmers with less access to capital out of business. It would also raise the cost of eggs for consumers. All of this is fine with the vegan Humane Society, of course, which wants to reduce demand for animal products by raising costs. (In France, farmers are literally dumping eggs on the street in protest over the scrambled market that has resulted from animal-rights-backed legislation.)

If King’s amendment isn’t passed, it could invite states to start passing a slew of protectionist laws under the guise of “food safety” or “public health.” Vermont’s cheddar cheese producers could try to take swipes at New York and Wisconsin, while Florida orange growers could try to hassle California’s. Unfortunately, these illusory safety claims would likely have to be taken to court by the affected out-of-state producers—hardly an appetizing thought for a food producer already trying to make ends meet. Moreover, protection rackets will inevitably raise costs at the supermarket as competition is stifled.

The best way forward is to protect interstate commerce with the enactment of King’s amendment. It’ll help consumers, and it’ll stop activists who think that they can manipulate California’s ballot box into regulations affecting consumers in the other 49 states.



WebReadyTM Powered by WireReady® NSI


Top Agricultural News

  • Oklahoma Grain Elevator Cash Bids as of 2 p.m. Friday, October 22, 2021  Fri, 22 Oct 2021 15:19:14 CDT
  • Friday, October 22, 2021, Market Wrap-Up with Justin Lewis  Fri, 22 Oct 2021 15:15:18 CDT
  • Labor Shortages are the Root Cause of Stagnant Cattle Prices Says Justin Benavidez  Fri, 22 Oct 2021 13:14:24 CDT
  • OSU Inks Head Football Coach Mike Gundy to New Contract  Fri, 22 Oct 2021 13:11:06 CDT
  • Dairy Management Inc. 2020 Annual Report Available Online  Fri, 22 Oct 2021 12:40:03 CDT
  • Sign Up Now for the 2022 National Farmers Union Women's Conference  Fri, 22 Oct 2021 12:33:48 CDT
  • OSU Agriculture Honors Distinguished Group During Ceremony  Fri, 22 Oct 2021 11:54:25 CDT

  • More Headlines...


    Ron salutes our daily email sponsors!

    Oklahoma Beef council Oklahoma Ag Credit Oklahoma Farm Bureau National Livestock Credit Ag Mediation Program P&K Equipment Tulsa Farm Show Union Mutual Stillwater Milling Oklahoma Cattlemen's Association KIS FUTURES, INC.


    Search OklahomaFarmReport.com

    © 2008-2021 Oklahoma Farm Report
    Email Ron   |   Newsletter Signup   |    Current Spots   |    Program Links

    WebReady powered by WireReady® Inc.