Agricultural News
Talking Lame Duck, WOTUS and More with Bob Stallman
Thu, 13 Nov 2014 14:00:55 CST
With the 2014 November General Elections now behind us- we now face lame duck session. Bob Stallman, President of the American Farm Bureau Federation, says there are usually high hopes that several significant issues can be dealt with in the limited venue of a lame duck session. The reality is that few votes are actually taken and that means little can come out of this final work of the old Congress, ahead of when the GOP becomes the majority party in early 2015.
Stallman is hopeful that a tax extenders package can get through the House and Senate and offer an answer to farmers and ranchers wanting to know what the tax rules will be on end of the year purchases of equipment.
He also expects that a Continuing Resolution or some type of budget bill or bills will get done to keep Uncle Sam funded into some or all of the current fiscal year.
Nothing else will likely surface before the GOP becomes the Majority in the Senate and picks up additional seats for their House Majority.
Farm Director Ron Hays talked with the AFBF President about a variety of subjects before the Lame Duck, including WOTUS and how to slow it down or stop it, COOL , the Beef Checkoff, Big Data and the overall mood that Stallman sees in his membership.
On the subject of Big Data- the Farm Bureau announced an agreement on data privacy and security principles that will encourage the use and development of a full range of innovative, technology-driven tools and services to boost the productivity, efficiency and profitability of American agriculture.
The coalition supporting the principles includes: American Farm Bureau Federation, American Soybean Association, Beck's Hybrids, Dow AgroSciences LLC, DuPont Pioneer, John Deere, National Association of Wheat Growers, National Corn Growers Association, National Farmers Union, Raven Industries, The Climate Corporation a division of Monsanto, and USA Rice Federation.
"The principles released today provide a measure of needed certainty to farmers regarding the protection of their data," said American Farm Bureau President Bob Stallman. "Farmers using these technology-driven tools will help feed a growing world while also providing quantifiable environmental benefits. These principles are meant to be inclusive and we hope other farm organizations and ATPs join this collaborative effort in protecting farm-level data as well as educating farmers about this revolutionary technology."
The principles promise to greatly accelerate the move to the next generation of agricultural data technology, which includes in-cab displays, mobile devices and wireless-enabled precision agriculture that has already begun to boost farm productivity across the United States.
Many analysts compare today's big-data-driven precision ag to the "green revolution" of the 1960s and 70s, which has likely saved a billion lives or more from starvation since its inception.
Central to the effort surrounding the principles will be grower education initiatives that will include an easy-to-use transparency evaluation tool for farmers. The tool would allow farmers to compare and contrast specific issues within ATP contracts and to see how the contracts align with these agreed-upon principles, and how ATPs manage and use farmers' data.
"The privacy and security principles that underpin these emerging technologies, whether related to how data is gathered, protected and shared, must be transparent and secure. On this matter, we all agree," said Stallman. "Farmers are excited about this new technology front, which is why Farm Bureau asked these groups to come together and begin this collaborative dialogue."
Using precision technology, farmers send large amounts of business and production information to ATPs regarding their planting, production and harvesting practices. Companies use that data to produce "field prescriptions" and benchmarks that provide valuable information farmers can use to make decisions on when, how and which crop varieties to plant, and optimize the application of crop protection and fertilizer inputs. "That's good for the environment and efficient for food production, too," Stallman said.
The principles cover a wide range of issues that must be addressed before most farmers will feel assured to share their private business information with data providers. Highlights include:
· Ownership: The group believes that farmers own information generated on their farming operations. However, farming is complex and dynamic and it is the responsibility of the farmer to agree upon data use and sharing with the other stakeholders with an economic interest such as the tenant, landowner, cooperative, owner of the precision agriculture system hardware, and/or ATP etc. The farmer contracting with the ATP is responsible for ensuring that only the data they own or have permission to use is included in the account with the ATP.
· Collection, Access and Control: An ATP's collection, access and use of farm data should be granted only with the affirmative and explicit consent of the farmer. This will be by contract agreements, whether signed or digital.
· Notice: Farmers must be notified that their data is being collected and about how the farm data will be disclosed and used. This notice must be provided in an easily located and readily accessible format.
· Third-party access and use: Farmers and ranchers also need to know who, if anyone, will have access to their data beyond the primary ATP and how they will use it.
· Transparency and Consistency: ATPs shall notify farmers about the purposes for which they collect and use farm data. They should provide information about how farmers can contact the ATP with any inquiries or complaints, the types of third parties to which they disclose the data, and the choices the ATP offers for limiting its use and disclosure. An ATP's principles, policies and practices should be transparent and fully consistent with the terms and conditions in their legal contracts. An ATP will not change the customer's contract without his or her agreement.
· Choice: ATPs should explain the effects and abilities of a farmer's decision to opt in, opt out or disable the availability of services and features offered by the ATP. If multiple options are offered, farmers should be able to choose some, all, or none of the options offered. ATPs should provide farmers with a clear understanding of what services and features may or may not be enabled when they make certain choices.
· Portability: Within the context of the agreement and retention policy, farmers should be able to retrieve their data for storage or use in other systems, with the exception of the data that has been made anonymous or aggregated and is no longer specifically identifiable. Non-anonymized or non-aggregated data should be easy for farmers to receive their data back at their discretion.
· Data Availability: ATPs agree they should provide for the removal, secure destruction and return of original farm data from the ATP, and any third party with whom the ATP has shared the data, upon request by the account holder or after a pre-agreed period of time.
· Market Speculation: ATPs will not use farm data to illegally speculate in commodity markets.
· Liability & Security Safeguards: The ATP should clearly define terms of liability. Farm data should be protected with reasonable security safeguards against risks such as loss or unauthorized access, destruction, use, modification or disclosure. Polices for notification and response in the event of a breach should be established.
WebReadyTM Powered by WireReady® NSI
Top Agricultural News
More Headlines...
