HSUS Wins in Federal Court- Judge Tells National Pork Board to Stop Payments for Pork, the Other White Meat TrademarkFri, 02 Feb 2018 05:07:38
The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia today issued a ruling on a lawsuit challenging the sale of the Pork, The Other White Meat trademarks. U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson ruled that the review by Stout Risius Ross, financial advisory firm, did not adequately analyze the value of the trademarks and orders the annual payment from the National Pork Board to the National Pork Producers Council to cease.
The National Pork Producers Council sold the trademarks to the National Pork Board in 2006- with the Pork Board agreeing to pay thirty five million dollars.
After the ruling- the National Pork Producers' President Ken Maschhoff, an Illinois pork producer, offered the following statement.
“We are conducting a thorough review of the decision and evaluating our options. We are disappointed that the court partially denied the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s motion to dismiss this frivolous lawsuit, one that was never based on a legitimate legal challenge to a federally approved transaction but instead was brought by an anti-meat activist group intent on eliminating meat consumption and harming a vast U.S. industry that employs hundreds of thousands of Americans and feeds billions of people at home and abroad.
“NPPC enjoys the strong support of pork producers nationwide. Regardless of the final outcome in this case, we are well positioned to continue fighting for the livelihood of farmers and others in rural America.”
In 2012, Humane Society of United States filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court claiming the contract should have never been approved and the appraisal was not accurate. HSUS and other plaintiffs — which included Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement, an activist group, and a lone Iowa resident who is a member of this group — claimed that the trademarks were sold for an inflated price.
The court’s decision followed a motion last January to dismiss the lawsuit filed by the USDA, which authorized the transaction as part of its oversight responsibilities under the 1985 Pork Act. The Pork Act set up the Pork Checkoff program and established the National Pork Board to administer it. The USDA’s motion argued that the lawsuit, filed by the HSUS and two other parties, lacked merit, was barred by a six-year statute of limitations, that the plaintiffs failed to establish standing to file the lawsuit or show that they were harmed by the sale of the trademarks and that the agency’s evaluation of the sale of the trademarks showed they provided significant value to the pork industry.
Matthew Penzer, special counsel in The HSUS Animal Protection Litigation department, was an attorney on the case and issued the following statement:
“Today’s ruling halts an abusive misuse of millions of dollars of federal funds that was harmful to animals and responsible family farmers alike. We hope this case signals a future of greater scrutiny and accountable operation of these massively funded government programs.”
On USDA’s recent decision to continue annual multi-million dollar payouts, the court noted that “the trademarks that include The Other White Meat slogan have been declared to be obsolete, and have been retired from active use. So their value is minimal, or at best, undetermined.” And the court held that the agency’s decision “is arbitrary, capricious, and not supported by the record, and the agency is enjoined from approving any future payments.”
WebReadyTM Powered by WireReady® NSI
Top Agricultural News