Agricultural News
National Pork Producers Council Reacts to Obama Administration's "Midnight" GIPSA Rule
Wed, 14 Dec 2016 15:21:21 CST
In an apparent attack on rural America for its role in helping elect Donald Trump as president, the Obama administration today issued a regulation that could restrict the buying and selling of livestock, lead to consolidation of the livestock industry - putting farmers out of business - and increase consumer prices for meat. The National Pork Producers Council will work with the Trump administration and the new Congress to repeal the "unnecessary, destructive and illegitimate midnight rule."
Written by the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration (GIPSA), the "interim final" rule broadens the scope of the Packers and Stockyards Act (PSA) of 1921 related to the use of "unfair, unjustly discriminatory or deceptive practices" and "undue or unreasonable preferences or advantages." Specifically, the regulation would deem such actions per se violations of federal law even if they didn't harm competition or cause competitive injury, prerequisites for winning PSA cases. (Such actions currently are state court matters.)
"I can't imagine a more devastating regulation on an industry," said NPPC CEO Neil Dierks. "The rule, which creates legal uncertainty, will destroy opportunities for many in the U.S. pork industry, with no positive effect on competition, the regulation's supposed goal."
USDA in 2010 proposed a number of PSA provisions - collectively known as the GIPSA Rule - which Congress mandated in the 2008 Farm Bill. But the agency was blocked by lawmakers through amendments to annual agricultural spending legislation from implementing a regulation that would eliminate the need to prove a competitive injury to win a PSA lawsuit. In fact, Congress considered and rejected such a "no competitive injury" provision during debate on the 2008 Farm Bill. Additionally, eight federal appeals courts have held that harm to competition must be proved for an action to be a violation of the PSA.
When a rider wasn't included in the fiscal 2016 agricultural funding bill, Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack vowed his agency would move forward with the blocked regulation.
"The rule will be a boon to trial lawyers and a weapon activist groups will use to attack segments of the livestock industry," Dierks said. "The inevitable costs of the regulation could lead to further vertical integration of the pork industry, driving packers to produce more of their own hogs. That will reduce innovation, quality and competition, with no benefit to consumers. Coupled with the current strong headwinds buffeting pork producers, the net effect of this destructive, unnecessary and illegitimate midnight rule would be a crushing blow to hog farmers of all sizes and to America's rural economies."
A recent update of a study conducted by Informa Economics of the proposed 2010 GIPSA Rule found that today it would cost the pork industry more than $420 million annually, with the majority of the costs related to PSA lawsuits brought under a "no competitive injury" provision.
"The bottom line," said Dierks, "is that the White House picked trial lawyers and activists over farmers in forcing this regulation on rural America. We need to kill this illegitimate midnight rule."
The PSA regulation - and two related proposed rules - will be subject to a 60-day public comment period, which extends the rulemaking process into the Trump administration. NPPC, as it did following issuance of the proposed 2010 GIPSA Rule, will urge America's 68,000 pork producers to submit comments in opposition to the new regulation. Thousands of producers weighed in against the 2010 rule.
Source - National Pork Producers Council
WebReadyTM Powered by WireReady® NSI
Top Agricultural News
More Headlines...
