Oklahoma Farm Report masthead graphic with wheat on the left and cattle on the right.
Howdy Neighbors!
Ron Hays, Director of Farm and Ranch Programming, Radio Oklahoma Ag Network  |  2401 Exchange Ave, Suite F, Oklahoma City, Ok 73108  |  (405) 601-9211

advertisements
   
   
   
    
   
   
   
   
   
   
   

Agricultural News


Farm Bureau Accuses NRCS of Discretionary Abuse, Calls on Secretary Perdue to Make Agency Reforms

Wed, 18 Sep 2019 11:58:48 CDT

Farm Bureau Accuses NRCS of Discretionary Abuse, Calls on Secretary Perdue to Make Agency Reforms Farmers and ranchers are being denied due process as part of an abuse of discretion by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, according to a scathing ruling by the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. The ruling is highlighted in a letter from the American Farm Bureau Federation calling on Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue to enact much-needed reforms in the agency.



The letter focuses on the case of an Indiana farm owned by David and Rita Boucher, and Mrs. Boucher’s 17-year saga of unfair treatment at the hands of the NRCS staff. The Bouchers removed nine trees on 2.8 acres and NRCS, in turn, demanded they plant 300 trees per acre as compensation.



The court found that NRCS wrongly accused the Bouchers of harming a non-existent wetland on their property but made no effort to correct the record even after the accusations were shown to be groundless. The NRCS judgment made the farm ineligible for a wide variety of government programs, creating a roadblock for the Bouchers to obtain the loans and crop insurance necessary to stay in operation.



“The USDA repeatedly failed to follow applicable law and agency standards,” the court wrote. “It disregarded compelling evidence showing that the acreage in question never qualified as wetlands that could have been converted illegally into croplands. And the agency has kept shifting its explanations for treating the acreage as converted wetlands. The USDA’s treatment of the Bouchers’ acreage as converted wetlands easily qualifies as arbitrary, capricious, and an abuse of discretion.”



The Bouchers are not the only victims of NRCS regulatory abuse, as noted in the letter and as previously conveyed to USDA by AFBF.



“The wrongs identified by the Seventh Circuit are systemic throughout NRCS and representative of the experience of countless farmers,” AFBF wrote. “We hope that you find this case as shocking and troubling as does the Seventh Circuit.



“USDA’s implementation of its conservation compliance programs transcends politics: the Bouchers’ battle began in the beginning of the Bush presidency and continued through the Obama and Trump administrations. The unanimous judges on the Seventh Circuit were appointed by Presidents Reagan, Clinton, and Obama. And the actions by USDA were not limited to a few individuals, but were endemic through all levels of review and appeal.”



AFBF is calling on Secretary Perdue to accept the Seventh Circuit decision and compensate Mrs. Boucher for costs incurred in her fight against the federal government. More broadly, the letter urges USDA to view its finalization of the Interim Final Rule as an opportunity to correct the problems identified in the ruling.



The letter explains, “In reality, affected farmers typically have been unable to challenge the agency’s decisions because they simply cannot afford to lose eligibility or the costs of a fruitless appeal. Generally, farmers follow the direction of the agency to avoid ineligibility instead of appealing.”



Additionally, AFBF is asking USDA to:



- Retrain National Appeals Division judges and agency directors in how to provide a fair and balanced hearing;

- Require USDA to provide the entire record or decisional documentation to the farmers at the time of alleged compliance violation;

- Allow the farmer and his or her counsel to call NRCS technical staff as witnesses in the appeal;

- Accept evidence provided by the farmer as true, absent substantial evidence to the contrary; and

- Compensate the farmer for legal fees when the farmer wins an appeal – i.e., when the farmer is forced to incur costs as a result of an incorrect decision from NRCS.


Source - American Farm Bureau Federation



   

 

WebReadyTM Powered by WireReady® NSI

 


Top Agricultural News

  • Feeder Steers Sold 3.00-5.00 Lower, Feeder Heifers Traded 1.00-3.00 Lower Wednesday at OKC West  Wed, 22 Jan 2020 17:43:53 CST
  • Oklahoma Grain Elevator Cash Bids as of 2:00 p.m. Wednesday, January 22, 2020  Wed, 22 Jan 2020 14:58:08 CST
  • Wednesday, January 22, 2020 Market Wrap-Up with Justin Lewis  Wed, 22 Jan 2020 15:09:44 CST
  • Secretary of Agriculture Perdue to Share Insights At 2020 Cattle Industry Convention  Wed, 22 Jan 2020 13:21:22 CST
  • Express Ranches Claim Grand Champion Carload at National Western   Wed, 22 Jan 2020 12:28:23 CST
  • Cattle Disease Traceability Continues Advancing   Wed, 22 Jan 2020 10:43:57 CST
  • Wednesday Preopening Market Update with Dave Lanning  Wed, 22 Jan 2020 07:24:47 CST
  • Alisa Harrison Reminds Producers Their Beef is Still the Preferred Choice to be Found in the Meat Aisle  Wed, 22 Jan 2020 06:51:28 CST

  • More Headlines...

       

    Ron salutes our daily email sponsors!

    Oklahoma City Farm Show KIS FUTURES, INC. Oklahoma Ag Credit Oklahoma Farm Bureau National Livestock Credit Ag Mediation Program P&K Equipment AFR Insurance Stillwater Milling Oklahoma Cattlemen's Association

    Our Road to Rural Prosperity sponsors!

    Banc First OPSRC ORWA TPAOO TPAOO

    Search OklahomaFarmReport.com


       
       
    © 2008-2020 Oklahoma Farm Report
    Email Ron   |   Newsletter Signup   |    Current Spots   |    Program Links

    WebReady powered by WireReady® Inc.