Agricultural News
Mark Johnson and Paul Beck with Managment Practices to Add Value
Wed, 07 Jul 2021 08:35:02 CDT
Mark Johnson, Oklahoma State University Extension Beef Cattle Breeding Specialist, Along with Paul Beck OSU Beef Cattle Nutrition Specialist
offers herd health advice as part of the weekly series known as the "Cow Calf Corner" published electronically by Dr. Peel, Mark Johnson, and Paul Beck. today Johnson is talking about managment practices.
As we continue to deal with high feed, fertilizer and fuel costs, this week we focus on additional management practices to add value to beef calves. As discussed last week, good management adds value. This value can be captured through marketing preconditioned weaned calves or retained ownership past weaning. Along with weaning at least 45 days, preconditioning includes several practices that add value to cattle for the buyer and seller. Beyond this, additional weight gain can be added by growth implants, adding further value to your calves.
· Bovine respiratory disease is the biggest issue for stocker operators and feedlots, through death loss, antibiotic cost, reduced performance and increased labor. Fully vaccinated and preconditioned calves have been shown to have reduce sick pulls in the receiving pens by 90% and decrease chronics by over 70%.
· Castrated steers bring $5-10/cwt more than bulls, and as they get bigger discounts for bulls increase. Intact bull calves are 1.5 to 2.5 times more likely to get sick, and total gain during receiving is reduced, affecting total performance for the entire ownership period.
· Dehorning adds value to horned cattle. Often discounts for horned cattle can match or exceed discounts for bull calves.
· Discounts for horned bulls can reach up to $25/cwt compared to dehorned or polled steer calves.
· Implants can increase gains by 10 to 20%. For the cost of $2 or less, the 18 pounds of added weight at sale can be worth over $25.
· Producers often think they can leave bull calves intact and increase weaning weights due to natural testosterone. Testosterone production is very low until puberty, so weaning weights are not heavier for intact bulls compared to steers. Weaning weights of implanted steers are often much heavier than intact bull calves.
USDA Verified Programs
Verifying management practices through a USDA verified program is another possibility for adding value to calves. Many of these programs exist and are driven by consumer demand. USDA verified programs exist to meet any number of verifiable management claims by a producer. Typically the claims are defined so consumers can make purchasing decisions at the retail level. Source and Age Verification for beef has two components. Source verification is the ability to trace beef back to the farm or ranch where the cattle were born. Age verification is the ability to document and verify the age of the animal throughout the production chain and at slaughter. Natural verification is the ability to document that no antibiotics, growth implants or other additives have been given to animals. Producers must keep detailed calving records and be willing to share those records with the verifying authority. Production records alone do not qualify cattle to be sold as verified. Verified claims have to be validated either through a USDA Process Verified Program (PVP) or a USDA Quality System Assessment (QSA) program. Both programs require quality management systems where specific production processes and/or attributes are documented in a way that makes them verifiable through required systematic audits. PVP and QSA programs have similarities, but can be quite different. PVPs provide the opportunity to make marketing claims about beef attributes beyond age and source verification (which nearly all PVPs include), including specific genetics, feeding practices, animal welfare, environmental production aspects and other claims that are otherwise difficult to verify by visual inspection. QSA defines the type of USDA program that has a narrower scope and is less complex than PVP programs. QSAs were initially developed primarily to qualify beef for export. The only beef attributes verifiable through a QSA program are age, source and non-hormone treated cattle (NHTC).
Local access to these programs is likely through an approved feed yard, breed association, livestock market or major packer. Interested producers should begin by exploring individual PVPs to determine if they are already producing cattle with the potential to capture additional value beyond source and age verification. For more detailed information on QSA and PVP programs visit ''Minding Your Cattle Ps and Qs: Basic Facts on Source, Age, and other Claim Verification through PVP and QSA Programs | Oklahoma State University (okstate.edu) <https://extension.okstate.edu/fact-sheets/minding-your-cattle-ps-and-qs-basic-facts-on-source-age-and-other-claim-verification
Marketing cattle through PVP or QSA programs does not guarantee increased profitability since there is a cost associated with qualifying cattle for these programs (ear tags, audit expense, products required specific to the program, potential cash outlay for participation, etc.). As well, the loss of production from not using growth implant technologies in specific programs must be evaluated. That being said, getting paid for the management practices you already have in place (or could effectively implement) is a good idea in a time of high production costs.
Dr Mark Johnson discusses preconditioning to add value to cattle on Sunup TV from 7/3/2021. -Cow-Calf Corner - Preconditioning Part 1 7/3/21 SUNUP TV (okstate.edu)
WebReadyTM Powered by WireReady® NSI
Top Agricultural News
More Headlines...
