Oklahoma Farm Report masthead graphic with wheat on the left and cattle on the right.
Howdy Neighbors!
Ron Hays, Director of Farm and Ranch Programming, Radio Oklahoma Ag Network  |  2401 Exchange Ave, Suite F, Oklahoma City, Ok 73108  |  (405) 601-9211


Agricultural News

Feedlot Efficiency Doesn't Equate to Beef Industry Efficiency, Peel Says

Fri, 28 Dec 2012 14:25:21 CST

Feedlot Efficiency Doesn't Equate to Beef Industry Efficiency, Peel Says
In his latest article in the Cow-Calf Newsletter, Derrell S. Peel, Oklahoma State University Extension Livestock Marketing Specialist, suggests that an "apples to apples" comparison shows using grain to grow beef is not nearly as inefficient as once thought.

Increased demand for corn has increased corn prices which causes changes in both supply and demand to restore corn market balance. On the one hand, high corn prices stimulate increased corn supply by bidding more resources into corn production. This leads to many impacts in other crop markets, such as higher prices for all major crops. At the same time, high corn prices reallocate corn among various users with higher prices moving some corn away from previous users and into the new demand. In short, high corn prices encourage corn users to reduce use and the beef industry is no exception.

It is often noted that beef is the least efficient user of grain among livestock industries. Indeed, cattle finishing requires five to six pounds of grain per pound of meat produced compared to less than three pounds for pork and less than two pounds for broiler production. However, this is only during the finishing phase and does not consider the amount of grain relative to the total weight of the animal. For example, a 600 pound feeder animal fed to 1350 pounds means that 56 percent of the total finished weight is completed in the feedlot with grain. Using a 5.5 pound feedlot conversion means that 4,125 pounds of grain are used to produce the animal, which is an overall grain use of 3.06 pounds of grain per pound of finished weight. Recognizing this alone means that beef is not nearly as inefficient compared to pork and poultry as the feedlot portion alone would suggest.

Moreover, the beef industry has the ability to adjust the industry production process while maintaining carcass quality and meat characteristics. For example, by increasing the placement weight to 850 pounds, the feedlot phase now represents 37 percent of the total final weight (1350 pounds) of the finished animal. The larger (and probably older) animal will have a higher feedlot conversion, perhaps 7 pounds of grain per pound of gain. In this example, the total amount of grain used to produce the finished animal is 3,500 pounds of grain, down 15 percent from the light weight placement above. Total grain use for the industry is now 2.59 pounds of grain per pound of finished animal despite the fact that feedlot conversion is higher when feeding an animal placed at a heavier weight.   

The examples presented here are generalized and do not include all the details of animal production but do illustrate the basic concept and several important implications for the beef industry. The beef industry can respond to high grain prices by changing the industry production process so that a higher proportion of total animal weight is achieved with forage based production prior to feedlot finishing. It also means that the technical efficiency measure of feedlot conversion is not the appropriate measure of industry efficiency with respect to grain use. As feedlots feed animals placed at heavier weight, feed conversion on a per-pound of gain basis will increase but overall industry use of grain will decrease. For many years, cheap grain meant that anything that enhanced grain use and feedlot measures of technical efficiency were consistent with industry efficiency. This is no longer true. Industry efficiency must be measured across the entire industry and not just in the feedlot sector.



WebReadyTM Powered by WireReady® NSI


Top Agricultural News

  • Oklahoma Grain Elevator Cash Bids as of 2 p.m. Tuesday, October 26, 2021  Tue, 26 Oct 2021 15:15:28 CDT
  • Ross Wilson Applauds Cattle Feedlot Efforts to Increase Negotiated Cash Trade  Tue, 26 Oct 2021 15:13:45 CDT
  • Tuesday, October 26, 2021, Market Wrap-Up with Justin Lewis  Tue, 26 Oct 2021 14:40:02 CDT
  • Expansion Partners to Heal the Harvester  Tue, 26 Oct 2021 11:55:46 CDT
  • Hilliary Communications to Launch $45 Million in Fiber-Optic Infrastructure Expansion in Rural America  Tue, 26 Oct 2021 11:48:59 CDT
  • Ralph Lauren Corporate Foundation and Soil Health Institute Unveil New U.S. Regenerative Cotton Program  Tue, 26 Oct 2021 11:34:52 CDT
  • Fire Weather Watch in Effect in Oklahoma Panhandle Ahead of Developing Storms  Tue, 26 Oct 2021 10:34:06 CDT
  • CattleFax CEO Randy Blach Says Inflated Prices are Here to Stay  Tue, 26 Oct 2021 10:23:01 CDT

  • More Headlines...


    Ron salutes our daily email sponsors!

    Oklahoma Beef council Oklahoma Ag Credit Oklahoma Farm Bureau National Livestock Credit Ag Mediation Program P&K Equipment Tulsa Farm Show Union Mutual Stillwater Milling Oklahoma Cattlemen's Association KIS FUTURES, INC.


    Search OklahomaFarmReport.com

    © 2008-2021 Oklahoma Farm Report
    Email Ron   |   Newsletter Signup   |    Current Spots   |    Program Links

    WebReady powered by WireReady® Inc.