Oklahoma Farm Report masthead graphic with wheat on the left and cattle on the right.
Howdy Neighbors!
Ron Hays, Director of Farm and Ranch Programming, Radio Oklahoma Ag Network  |  2401 Exchange Ave, Suite F, Oklahoma City, Ok 73108  |  (405) 601-9211

advertisements
   
   
   
   
   
    
   
   
   
   
   

Agricultural News


Peel Analyzes the Unusual Cattle Markets of 2015

Mon, 04 May 2015 14:35:27 CDT

Peel Analyzes the Unusual Cattle Markets of 2015 Derrell S. Peel, Oklahoma State University Extension Livestock Marketing Specialist, writes in the latest Cow/Calf Corner newsletter.


Unusual market conditions lead to unusual incentives that result in unusual market behavior. This makes markets unusually difficult to figure out. There is considerable variability in views across the industry about the current and coming fed cattle market for the remainder of 2015. And for good reason; we are seeing extremes in conditions and behavior that are clouding the picture.


The April 1 cattle on feed inventory was essentially unchanged from one year ago. However the makeup of that inventory was unique in several respects. The number of heifers on feed was not only down 10.1 percent from one year ago, it was the lowest quarterly heifer on feed number since 1996. This is not surprising given the anticipated heifer retention and herd expansion that is underway. Fewer heifers in feedlots would naturally suggest that steers make up a bigger percentage of total cattle on feed. More than that however, the number of steers on feed actually increased in April, up 5.4 percent year over year, to the highest quarterly steers on feed total since January, 2008. As a result, the April 1, 2015 steers on feed total was 69 percent of total cattle on feed, 2.4 percent higher than one year ago and a new record level. Until now, the 2014 total was tied for a record percentage of steers on feed that only occurred once prior (in 2005) in data back to 1996. It appears that feedlots have drawn heavily from available steer supplies to maintain feedlot inventories so far this year.


Variability in placement weights also adds to the challenge of determining the timing of fed cattle production. For many months, monthly feedlot placements have tended to swing between large proportions of lightweight cattle (less than 600 pounds) and placements of heavy feeders (over 800 pounds), often with fewer cattle in the traditional feeder placement weight categories of 600 to 800 pounds. The “tails” of the placement weight distribution add to the difficulty because there is no way to estimate the average weight in the category, especially for the heavy feeders. Average placement weights vary because of changes in average animal size and because of changes in the steer to heifer mix.


March placements consisted of 39.4 percent of placements over 800 pounds, the highest monthly level for the weight category in available data back to 1996. The average of January through March placements has the 800-plus pound category averaging 35.8 percent of total placements compared to 31 percent for the same period one year ago. A 12 month moving average of placements by weight group confirms that placements of 800-plus pound feeder cattle are at a record level at the current time. The average weight of this group could vary from just over 800 pounds to over 900 pounds and change the timing of marketings of these animals by a month. A casual review of auction reports suggests that significant numbers of steers up to and exceeding 1,000 pounds have been marketed this spring. This may suggest a somewhat bigger seasonal increase in feedlot marketings into the third quarter and a bigger tightening of fed cattle supplies late in the year. However, variability in the total number of placements and in the weight distribution in recent months makes this anything but a clear picture.


Steer and heifer carcass weights continue to push well about year ago levels as a result of several factors. On the one hand, heavier carcass weights offset declining cattle slaughter to reduce the impact of declining beef production in response to high beef prices. Steer and heifer slaughter is down 7.1 percent so far this year while total beef production is down only 5.2 percent, due to increased carcass weights. Both feedlots and packers are complicit in pushing slaughter cattle to heavier weights as a result of this general market incentive.


Feedlots continue to have additional production incentives to feed cattle longer and to bigger weights, as they have had for several months. Limited supplies of feeder cattle, record high feeder cattle prices and lower feed costs all contribute to feedlot incentives to hold cattle longer, which keep feedlot inventories higher despite declining feedlot production. Data from several Kansas feedlots confirms that average days on feed are at record levels. The increase in days on feed for heifers is even more pronounced than for steers, contributing to the lack of seasonal decline in heifer carcass weights so far this year.


In pursing market incentives to delay cattle marketings and push cattle to bigger weights, feedlots are trading animal performance on the animals currently in the feedlot for the costs of replacing inventories with new animals. The Kansas feedlot data has shown for several months that average daily gains are lower year over year and feed conversions are higher; both expected outcomes of feeding heavier animals longer. As a result, feedlot cost of gain has not decreased as much as lower corn prices would suggest because poorer performance is offsetting some of the cheaper feed cost. This tradeoff suggests there is a limit to how far feedlots can push fed cattle weights. It also suggests that the incentive could change abruptly if feed prices were to increase.


Finally, the relative role of dairy animals in total feedlot production is at an unprecedented level. Declining beef cattle inventories and declining veal slaughter (most of which is dairy calves) mean that dairy animals accounted for nearly 26 percent of the net (adjusted for veal slaughter) 2014 calf crop; a record level. Dairy calves are typically placed on feed at very light weights and stay in feedlots up to a year. This means that relatively large numbers of dairy calves are impacting fed cattle markets in 2015. Analysts often uses measures such as estimated cattle on feed over 120 days to assess the currentness of feedlot marketings. However. such measures are difficult to interpret when dairy calves play a proportionately larger role in cattle feeding as they do now.


 

WebReadyTM Powered by WireReady® NSI

 


Top Agricultural News

  • Global Changes Could Impact U.S. Farmers' Spring Planting Intentions Says USDA Chief Economist Rob Johansson  Fri, 03 Apr 2020 14:30:08 CDT
  • Despite Global Challenges, U.S. Pork and Beef Exports on Record Pace through February  Fri, 03 Apr 2020 14:07:52 CDT
  • USDA Adds Additional Flexibilities for Crop Insurance to Support America’s Farmers and Ranchers  Fri, 03 Apr 2020 13:18:47 CDT
  • Coronavirus Impact Ripples Across Farm Country  Fri, 03 Apr 2020 14:15:59 CDT
  • *Deadline Extended* OKFB Accepting Applications for $1,000 Scholarships  Fri, 03 Apr 2020 11:39:47 CDT
  • National Sorghum Producers to Open Board Director Applications  Fri, 03 Apr 2020 10:17:47 CDT
  • USDA Announces Second Application Window for Distance Learning and Telemedicine Grant Program Funding  Fri, 03 Apr 2020 10:15:47 CDT
  • U.S. Custom Harvesters Will be Here when Producers Need Them   Fri, 03 Apr 2020 09:45:54 CDT

  • More Headlines...

       

    Ron salutes our daily email sponsors!

    Oklahoma City Farm Show KIS FUTURES, INC. Oklahoma Ag Credit Oklahoma Farm Bureau National Livestock Credit Ag Mediation Program P&K Equipment AFR Insurance Stillwater Milling Oklahoma Cattlemen's Association

    Our Road to Rural Prosperity sponsors!

    Banc First OPSRC ORWA TPAOO TPAOO

    Search OklahomaFarmReport.com


       
       
    © 2008-2020 Oklahoma Farm Report
    Email Ron   |   Newsletter Signup   |    Current Spots   |    Program Links

    WebReady powered by WireReady® Inc.