RFA Issues One-Pager to Correct Anti-Ethanol Rhetoric on the Presidential Campaign TrailThu, 21 Jan 2016 11:20:21 CST
In response to the anti-ethanol rhetoric that has been dominating the presidential campaign in the run-up to the Iowa caucuses, the Renewable Fuels Association (RFA) sent a one-pager to media outlets to correct the misconceptions regarding ethanol in general and the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) in particular.
*First and foremost, there is no “corn ethanol subsidy.” The Volumetric Ethanol Excise Tax Credit (also known as the “blender’s tax credit”) expired five years ago in 2011. Further it was gasoline blenders — not ethanol producers — who received a 45 cent per gallon tax credit for each gallon of ethanol blended. The Small Ethanol Producer Tax Credit also expired in 2011.
*The Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) is not a “subsidy.” The RFS is not a tax incentive or subsidy in any way, shape, or form. The RFS has absolutely no impact on the federal budget or tax revenues. Rather, the RFS is a program that guarantees lower-carbon biofuels will have access to a fuel market that is overwhelmingly and unfairly dominated by petroleum.
*There is also no such thing as a “corn ethanol mandate,” let alone an “ethanol mandate.” The RFS does not mandate the use of corn ethanol or any other type of ethanol for that matter. Rather, the RFS requires that oil companies blend increasing volumes of renewable fuels, without specifying the type of renewable fuel. In fact, oil companies may meet their RFS obligations by blending and marketing biogas, renewable diesel, renewable jet fuel, biobutanol, biodiesel, and a host of other renewable fuel options. While a wide variety of renewable fuels are being produced today, ethanol has been the highest-volume and lowest-cost renewable fuel available to meet RFS requirements.
*What about oil subsidies? While the ethanol industry does not receive any federal subsidies or tax breaks, the oil industry continues to receive an estimated $4–5 billion annually in tax breaks, including some programs that have existed for more than a century.
*In 1916 — a full century ago — Congress created the “intangible drilling cost” provision. This allows oil companies to write off up to 70 percent of their drilling costs and depreciate the rest.
*In 1926, Congress created the “depletion allowance,” which effectively modified the tax code to account for the “depletion” of oil reserves. Under the provision, an oil producer may deduct 15 percent of any gross income from a well. Unlike normal depreciation, this deduction may be claimed by oil companies indefinitely.
*The “domestic manufacturing deduction” was extended to oil companies in 2004.
*The oil industry receives other sundry tax incentives, subsidies, and breaks, including the “foreign tax credit,” “credit for production of nonconventional fuels,” “credit for enhanced oil recovery costs,” and others.
RFA President and CEO Bob Dinneen urged members of the media to contact the RFA if they have questions about ethanol or the RFS.
“Unfortunately the media has been perpetuating a lot of the misinformation about the ethanol industry as they cover the presidential candidates,” said Dinneen. “There are two sides to every story and if reporters have questions, or need further clarification on any ethanol-related issues, we are ready and available to assist them.”
WebReadyTM Powered by WireReady® NSI
Top Agricultural News