Oklahoma Farm Report masthead graphic with wheat on the left and cattle on the right.
Howdy Neighbors!
Ron Hays, Director of Farm and Ranch Programming, Radio Oklahoma Ag Network  |  2401 Exchange Ave, Suite F, Oklahoma City, Ok 73108  |  (405) 601-9211

advertisements
   
   
   
    
   
   
   
   
   
   
   

Agricultural News


ODAFF Calls Proposed Rule an Effort to Redefine Organic Production as Animal Welfare

Tue, 12 Jul 2016 16:49:10 CDT

ODAFF Calls Proposed Rule an Effort to Redefine Organic Production as Animal Welfare The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Agricultural Marketing Service proposed a rule last April in reference to the National Organic Program on organic livestock and poultry practices. The proposed rule would set and enforce clear and consistent standards to ensure consistency and transparency in organic production practices to strengthen consumer confidence and protect the integrity of the organic seal, according to the National Organic Standards Board.


Current USDA organic regulation requirements have been identified as general and unfocused in ensuring organic livestock and poultry welfare. The proposal will eliminate these inconsistencies by addressing four broad areas including living conditions, animal healthcare, transport and slaughter.


The Oklahoma Department of Agriculture, Food & Forestry submitted the following formal comments on the proposed rule today.


The Oklahoma Department of Agriculture, Food & Forestry has several concerns regarding the USDA-AMS proposed organic livestock and poultry rule and feel strongly it is an effort to redefine organic production as animal welfare.


Organic production has historically pertained to fertilizers, pesticides, herbicides, antibiotics and pharmaceuticals. The recommended regulations relating almost exclusively to animal welfare practices and housing have no relation to artificial chemicals and therefor have no relation to the historical definition of organic.


The provisions prohibit practices such as beak trimming, caponization, cattle wattling, de-beaking, de-snooding, dubbing, mulesing, and toe-trimming. ODAFF not only feels that these practices are no longer used in farming, and are only included to elicit outrage from an already ag-hostile constituency. We think it appropriate for USDA to encourage such misperception for ag producers.


The proposed rule would eliminate the use of solid structure roofs or covered porches which subjects livestock and poultry to brutal summer heat with no shade and contact with wild birds and animals that are known vectors for Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) and exotic Newcastle disease. This provision of the proposed rule is also in direct conflict with the Food & Drug Administration’s (FDA) Egg Safety Rule requirements to prevent the introduction of Salmonella enteritidis from wild birds and other sources.


The National Assembly of State Health Officials states “this proposed rule is in conflict with our efforts to educate and encourage use of biosecurity actions to help minimize exposure to wild birds. The proposal eliminates an option farmers have to better protect their flocks, while maintaining organic principles and certification. The proposed rule actually requires direct outdoor exposure and contact with birds and animals which is known to be contrary to sound principles of biosecurity and poultry health in general. AMS acknowledges the increased risk, so the fact that this change in the rule is even being considered is a major concern.”


According to NASDA, following the nation’s most devastating animal incident, the 2014-2015 Avian Influenza outbreak, U.S. trading partners imposed bans on all shipments of U.S. poultry and products, and thirty-eight trading partners imposed partial or regional bans on shipments from states or parts of states with HPAI cases. China, Russia, and South Korea, three of the top ten destinations for U.S. poultry meat in 2014, banned all imports of U.S. poultry.


Our opposition to USDA’s proposed rule in no way reflects ODAFF’s support of organic production. We believe organic producers are an essential part of the agriculture industry worldwide and play an integral part in feeding a growing world population. Organic producers provide diversity and necessary options for consumers and producers as well.


Learn more about the National Organic Program's proposed rule by clicking, here.


Read the proposed rule on the Federal Register by clicking, here.


To view FAQs on the proposed rule, click here.


   

 

WebReadyTM Powered by WireReady® NSI

 


Top Agricultural News

  • Oklahoma Grain Elevator Cash Bids as of 2:00 p.m. Friday, January 17, 2020  Sat, 18 Jan 2020 10:35:51 CST
  • Friday, January 17, 2020 Market Wrap-Up with Justin Lewis  Fri, 17 Jan 2020 15:03:22 CST
  • Michael Peters of Okarche Named Secretary-Treasurer for U.S. Wheat Associates   Fri, 17 Jan 2020 13:32:52 CST
  • Cattle Industry Will Provide Watchful Eye as US and Chinese Trade Officials Work to End Non Scientific Trade Barriers for US Beef  Fri, 17 Jan 2020 12:26:35 CST
  • A Positive Week for the Beef Industry Concerning Trade   Fri, 17 Jan 2020 11:36:50 CST
  • Alltech Launches Relief Effort for Australian Farmers  Fri, 17 Jan 2020 09:06:38 CST
  • Friday Preopening Market Update with Dave Lanning  Fri, 17 Jan 2020 08:31:09 CST
  • Atop the RON Rural Soapbox - Former Secretary John Block  Fri, 17 Jan 2020 08:30:09 CST

  • More Headlines...

       

    Ron salutes our daily email sponsors!

    Oklahoma City Farm Show KIS FUTURES, INC. Oklahoma Ag Credit Oklahoma Farm Bureau National Livestock Credit Ag Mediation Program P&K Equipment AFR Insurance Stillwater Milling Oklahoma Cattlemen's Association

    Our Road to Rural Prosperity sponsors!

    Banc First OPSRC ORWA TPAOO TPAOO

    Search OklahomaFarmReport.com


       
       
    © 2008-2020 Oklahoma Farm Report
    Email Ron   |   Newsletter Signup   |    Current Spots   |    Program Links

    WebReady powered by WireReady® Inc.